Home / File 03
File 03 · Highgate · 1905–1910
India House
A student hostel in north London that the Government of India came to describe as the most dangerous organisation outside its own borders. It lasted five years.
What India House Was
Opened 1 July 1905 · Closed 1910A hostel first
India House began as a practical answer to a practical problem. Indian students arriving in London struggled to find lodgings; landlords refused them, and the respectable boarding houses were closed to them. Shyamji Krishna Varma, a Gujarati lawyer and Sanskritist who had made money in the princely states and settled in England, bought a large house in Highgate and opened it as a residence for Indian students.
It was opened on 1 July 1905 by H. M. Hyndman, the English socialist and founder of the Social Democratic Federation. That detail is worth holding onto: the house had British allies from the start, and its politics were formed as much by London radicalism as by anything imported from India.
A political institution second
Varma had already founded the Indian Home Rule Society and, in January 1905, a monthly journal called The Indian Sociologist. India House gave both a physical address. It ran lectures, debates and weekly meetings; it awarded travelling fellowships and scholarships to bring Indian students to Britain; and it functioned as a clearing house for arguments that could not be published legally in India.
Its politics were not uniform, but its central claim was consistent: that British rule in India rested on force, that it was therefore not a legitimate government, and that Indians owed it no allegiance.
Under surveillance third
From the beginning the India Office watched the house. Varma's writings were quoted in Parliament; his journal's British printers were prosecuted; and by 1907 the pressure was sufficient that Varma moved to Paris, leaving the house to a younger and more confrontational group around V. D. Savarkar, who had arrived in 1906.
After 1 July 1909 the house was finished. Scotland Yard's interest became overwhelming, residents dispersed, and India House closed in 1910. The building still stands as a private address; a blue plaque there commemorates Varma.
The network
Select a name to read what the record supports. Solid lines mark documented associations; broken lines mark claims that are asserted but contested.
Select a name
Choose any box in the diagram to read what the record supports about that person or organisation.
Printing what India could not print
The central function of India House was publication. Under the Indian press and sedition laws, arguments of the kind Varma made monthly in London would have brought prosecution in Bombay or Lahore. Printed in Britain and posted to India, they travelled — until the government began intercepting the mail and prosecuting the British printers instead.
-
The Indian Sociologist, from January 1905
Varma's monthly, published from London. Its argument was consistent rather than elaborate: that a government maintained by force is not a government by consent, and that Indians were therefore under no obligation of loyalty to it. British printers were prosecuted for producing it; the socialist printer Guy Aldred was tried and imprisoned in 1909 for doing so.
-
The Indian War of Independence, 1857 (Savarkar, 1909)
Savarkar's history recast the 1857 rising — officially and universally described in Britain as the “Indian Mutiny” — as a national war of independence. The British authorities banned it before publication, and it was printed on the Continent and smuggled into India. The dispute over what to call 1857 was itself a political argument about whether Indians were rebels or a nation.
-
Lectures, scholarships and commemorations
India House ran a programme of weekly meetings, and Varma endowed travelling fellowships to bring students from India. Anniversaries of 1857 were marked publicly. This was slow work — the building of a political vocabulary rather than the planning of operations — and it is the part of India House's history most often left out of the story.
This archive does not reproduce extended passages from these publications. Titles, dates, publishers and the substance of their arguments are given instead, with the reader directed to library and archive holdings for the texts themselves.
Not one mind
Different destinations
People who passed through the India House circle ended up in strikingly different places: revolutionary organisation in Europe and America, Marxist and anarchist politics, scholarship, journalism, and in some cases retreat from politics altogether. Treating the house as a single programme flattens all of that.
Gandhi was here too
Gandhi was in London in 1909 on a deputation from South Africa, met Savarkar, and argued directly against the politics of assassination. He condemned the killing of Curzon Wyllie in print. The two positions that would define Indian politics for the next forty years were in the same city in the same season.
Association is not instruction
Dhingra's connection to this circle is documented. That fact does not, by itself, establish who knew what beforehand. Many accounts assert Savarkar's direct involvement; the evidence is contested and no charge was ever brought. Where the record stops, this archive stops.